Pennsylvania Supreme Court
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • Topics
    • Administrative Law
    • Appellate
    • Attorney Discipline
    • Contract
    • Expert Testimony
    • Insurance
    • Justiciability
    • Juvenile
    • MVFRL
    • Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
    • Probation and Parole
    • Recusal
    • Rules of Evidence
    • Tax Law
    • Statutory Construction
  • Civil, Right to Know

    PSP v. Grove: Motor Vehicle Recordings are not exempt from disclosure under Right to Know law

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    July 8, 2017

    In Pennsylvania State Police v. Grove, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania rules that Motor Vehicle Recordings are not exempt from the disclosure requirements of the Right to Know Act, and…

  • Attorney Discipline

    ODC v. Quigley: Misuse of IOLTA funds warrants disbarment

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    June 21, 2017

    Quigley was an attorney with a “generally good reputation as a good trial attorney.” However, Mr. Quigley began to have money problems. Other difficulties arose, including when an ad in…

  • Criminal, Direct Capital Review

    Com v. Johnson: A Death Penalty Appeal

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    May 26, 2017

    In Commonwealth v. Johnson, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a murder conviction and the jury’s imposition of the death penalty. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is charged with reviewing…

  • Attorney Discipline, Constitutional Provisions, Rule-Making Powers

    Villani v. Seibert: Dragonetti Statute Does Not Violate Separation of Powers; But We’re Leaving the Door Open

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    May 3, 2017

      Civil lawyers know—and may even fear—the threat of a Dragonetti action. The draconian name accurately depicts one of the few times in law that a lawyer can subsequently be…

  • Constitutional Provisions, Criminal, Probation and Parole

    Pittman v. Pa. Bd. of Probation and Parole: Board Abused its Discretion by Failing to Use Discretion

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    April 29, 2017

    The Parole Violation statute requires the Board of Probation and Parole to use its discretion when considering whether to credit “time at liberty on parole” to a convicted parole violator’s…

  • Criminal, Direct Capital Review

    Com v. Yandamuri: Direct Capital Appeal

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    April 28, 2017

    Com v. Yandamuri was a direct capital appeal case pursuant to the Court’s responsibility to directly review all death penalty cases. In a botched baby-kidnapping-for-ransom attempt, Raghunandan Yandamuri, a non-citizen,…

←Previous Page Next Page→

SCOPA Review

We provide Modern Coverage of America’s Oldest Court: the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

About

  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • About the Editor

Quick Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SCOPA Review