Pennsylvania Supreme Court
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • Topics
    • Administrative Law
    • Appellate
    • Attorney Discipline
    • Contract
    • Expert Testimony
    • Insurance
    • Justiciability
    • Juvenile
    • MVFRL
    • Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
    • Probation and Parole
    • Recusal
    • Rules of Evidence
    • Tax Law
    • Statutory Construction
  • Uncategorized

    City of Allentown v. Int’l Ass’n of Fire Fighters Local 302: Minimum staffing is not managerial prerogative

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    April 27, 2017

    In order to facilitate efficient and final labor agreements for public entities, Pennsylvania’s Act 111 provides for binding arbitration where an impasse in negotiations is reached. Such arbitration award can…

  • Civil, Family Law

    In re Adoption of LBM and ADM: A Child and His Counsel

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    April 9, 2017

    A child’s legal interests are not the same as his best interests, and in proceedings for the Termination of Parental Rights, the child has a statutory right to counsel for…

  • Administrative Law, Attorney Discipline, Civil

    Powell v. UCBR: Suspended Attorney May Not Practice Before Executive Agencies

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    April 3, 2017

    The pecking order of preferred advocates, the non-lawyer is preferable to the suspended lawyer. In Powell v. UCBR, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that, while a non-attorney may practice before…

  • Uncategorized

    Bill Cosby Jury Pool Round-up

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    March 15, 2017

    Today’s roundup is entirely composed of reaction to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s choice of Allegheny County for the new venire in the Bill Cosby case. Phil DiLucente of Pittsburgh’s WPXI News…

  • Criminal

    Bill Cosby gets Allegheny Jury

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    March 14, 2017

    The “Twelve Angry Men” who will be called upon to decide Bill Cosby’s fate in his pending rape trial will hail from Allegheny County, the Supreme Court decided yesterday. Under…

  • Civil, Insurance, MVFRL

    Ford v. American States Ins. Co – UIM Waiver is Close Enough

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    February 23, 2017

    what really happens when an insurance company does not “specifically comply” with the form in the statute? Or perhaps the better way to frame the argument—and the framing the Court…

←Previous Page Next Page→

SCOPA Review

We provide Modern Coverage of America’s Oldest Court: the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

About

  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • About the Editor

Quick Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SCOPA Review