Pennsylvania Supreme Court
  • Home
  • About the Editor
  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • Topics
    • Administrative Law
    • Appellate
    • Attorney Discipline
    • Contract
    • Expert Testimony
    • Insurance
    • Justiciability
    • Juvenile
    • MVFRL
    • Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence
    • Probation and Parole
    • Recusal
    • Rules of Evidence
    • Tax Law
    • Statutory Construction
  • Uncategorized

    Com v. Wholaver: PCRA death penalty appeal yields nothing of interest

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    January 31, 2018

    The unanimous Court rejected the arguments of a PCRA petitioner in Com v. Wholaver. As regular followers of the Court are aware, all death penalty cases result in a direct…

  • Constitutional Provisions

    League of Women Voters v. Com: Congressional Map Violates PA Constitution

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    January 22, 2018

    The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided today in a 4-3 per curiam decision that the congressional map drawn by the General Assembly is too partisan, and must be stricken because…

  • Uncategorized

    Gerrymandering Oral Argument Roundup 1-18-18

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    January 18, 2018

    Our roundup is all about Gerrymandering today. The Allentown Morning Call covers the oral argument and provides quotes from political operatives on both sides. The Philly Inquirer gives a balanced look…

  • Round-ups

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Round-up – 12-21-17

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    December 21, 2017

    Two Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases get early coverage, while the other December releases remain quiet. The Allentown Morning Call interviews the ACLU about Com v. $34,440 and the ongoing consideration…

  • Civil Forfeiture, Criminal

    Com v. $34,440: Proximity to Drugs presumption may be rebutted in forfeiture proceeding

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    December 21, 2017

    The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania continues its consideration of the powers of civil forfeiture in a 5-2 decision that the “proximity to drugs” presumption in civil forfeiture proceedings may be…

  • Attorney Discipline, Civil, Contract

    SCF Consulting, LLC v. Barrack, Rodos and Bacine: A contract action against a law firm alleging an unethical fee-sharing agreement should be allowed to proceed

    Written by

    Joel Ready

    on

    December 20, 2017

    A divided Supreme Court of Pennsylvania agreed that a lawsuit against a law firm based on a breach of a contract should be allowed to move forward, even though the…

←Previous Page Next Page→

SCOPA Review

We provide Modern Coverage of America’s Oldest Court: the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

About

  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • About the Editor

Quick Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SCOPA Review